Comments on: Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X 2 Review Independent PC Game Reviews & Guides Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Sh3ikh Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:24:21 +0000 To be fair to him he did give it a 3 out of 10 on value so that would justify his comment imo.

I would never really give games like this a go because since ace combat its always really been the same thing over and over and overrrr…. I would honestly say that if you bought this expecting something with good value and ‘non-repetitive’ gameplay your unfortunately mistaken.

Theres only so much you can do with a game like this and its just taking a ride on the back of the ‘Tom Clancy’ name.

Good review.

By: James Wells Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:30:47 +0000 well, the rating is decided by the 5 areas – I can’t just set a final score, i have to set one for each of its aspects.

By: Evil Tactician Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:22:21 +0000 @RJAckson just because a game is expensive for what you get, it doesn’t have to be a bad game. What James is saying in his review is that the game should be cheaper or have more substance for that price.

I’ve played it myself as well, its a good game but the drm and price really let it down.

By: RJackson Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:34:31 +0000 “If you had £29.99 to spend (the current price on Steam), and wanted a well presented and shiny action game, would I recommend this ?

And the answer is: No…”

And yet it gets a rating of 7.2? That seems a bit generous for a game you wouldn’t recommend.